Why is it hard for small firms to hire associates and paralegals right now?
What the published data shows about lawyer and paralegal supply, the recruiting calendar that is easy to miss from inside a small firm, the pay figures setting the market — and the levers left.
For a small firm, the law firm hiring shortage is a story about competition: law students headed for firms with summer-associate programs are recruited on a structured calendar, and the salary figures setting the market's reference points come from firms far larger.
The published data does not show an empty pipeline — the lawyer population grew in 2025 and paralegal employment is projected to show little or no change.
The squeeze small firms describe is about competition, timing and price, not the raw supply.
Here is what the numbers support, and the tactics that work anyway.
How big is the supply of new lawyers and paralegals?
Start with the totals, because they are the part of this story that gets misquoted.
The ABA's 2025 Profile of the Legal Profession, drawing on its National Lawyer Population Survey, counts 1,374,720 lawyers in 2025 — up 1.38% from 1,355,963 in 2024.
On the pipeline side, the ABA's 2025 509 data shows total JD enrollment at ABA-approved schools of about 120,047, with schools reporting about 36,340 JD degrees awarded.
For paralegals, the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook projects employment of paralegals and legal assistants to show little or no change from 2025 to 2035.
BLS also notes that demand for paralegals is expected to be limited by advances in technology, including artificial intelligence, which may make paralegals more efficient at research and document preparation.
If you are reading that paralegal jobs are booming, check which projection cycle the piece is quoting — this is the current one.
None of those totals answers the question a small firm is actually asking: how many candidates with the experience you need are within reach, in your market, this month?
Our research found no national statistic that measures unfilled openings at small firms, and we will not invent one.
What the totals do support is narrower: the story is not a collapsing pipeline, it is competition for the people with the experience you need — which is where the next section picks up.
For the role-by-role process behind it all, our hub on hiring for your law firm collects the employer guides.
BigLaw and remote competition for talent
Summer-associate recruiting — how firms that run 2L summer programs find their new lawyers — runs on a calendar that is easy to miss from inside a small firm.
In the 2025 recruiting cycle for the 2026 2L summer programs, NALP reports that 80% of offers came from employer-sponsored recruiting — direct applications — against 20% through law-school-sponsored channels such as on-campus interviewing.
Timing has moved up with it: most 2L summer offers in the 2025 cycle — 85% — were made before July, and NALP notes that some law schools shifted traditional OCI to the spring or early summer in 2025 as early interview programs spread.
Once a student is inside that system, the exit closes early.
NALP reports that 1L summer associates received offers to return for the 2L summer at a record 94.2% rate in the same cycle.
The practical consequence for a firm outside the system: most of those summer offers went out before the students' 2L year began — 85% of 2L summer offers in the 2025 cycle were made before July, for summer jobs that would not start until the following year.
NALP itself has flagged the pressure.
In an April 8, 2026 statement, the association said some recruiting practices may put undue pressure on students and urged employers to re-examine their approaches against its Principles for a Fair and Ethical Recruitment Process.
Those Principles are suggested best practices, not binding rules, and they leave offer timing and how long an offer stays open to each employer.
The other half of the competition is geography.
Firms that allow remote or hybrid work can hire past your commute radius, and a posting that says hybrid says something different from one that says on-site.
Whether your practice and your supervision setup can carry remote work is a real question — our guide to remote legal staff works through it — but treat geography as a choice you are making, not one the market made for you.
Which roles are hardest for small firms to fill?
Plainly: our research found no verified statistic ranking which legal roles are hardest to fill, so any "hardest to hire" league table you meet did not come from a source we can point to.
What we can do is read the data this page does have, role by role.
Associates sit at the center of both pressures this page describes — the recruiting calendar and the pay scale.
For students on the summer-associate track, that structured system reaches them first; for experienced associates, you are hiring them out of another employer's payroll.
"Associate shortage at small firms" is the search phrase; the mechanics behind it are the sections above and the pay section below.
The role-level process — what to verify, how to structure the offer — lives in our guide to hiring an associate attorney.
Paralegals look, on the projections, like the opposite problem: the BLS outlook projects little or no change, not growth.
But a projection of total employment across the occupation does not describe the availability of experienced paralegals in one city — and our research holds no verified turnover rate for paralegals, so treat any attrition percentage you are quoted as unsourced.
The "paralegal shortage" may be real in a given market; no national series in our research measures it.
What is verifiable sits in the role playbooks: hiring a paralegal and when your firm actually needs one.
Pay pressure: what small firms are bidding against
The reference numbers are public, and they are not small-firm numbers.
NALP's 2025 Associate Salary Survey found a median first-year associate base salary of $200,000 as of January 1, 2025 — $215,000 at firms of more than 700 lawyers.
Above that sits the published scale: a June 2026 salary memo reported by Above the Law put the first-year step of the large-firm market scale at $235,000 effective July 1, 2026.
Our research could not verify that memo directly, so treat the figure as reported rather than confirmed.
What those figures do not give you is a small-firm answer.
The NALP median spans the firms that responded to the survey; the scale belongs to the firms that publish one; our research holds no verified pay series for small firms, and we will not invent a range.
The honest benchmark is your own market — our guide to benchmarking pay walks the comparison, and the BLS wage pages for attorneys and paralegals give you the government series by state.
Be as deliberate about the rest of the offer as about the number: the terms of the work itself — earlier client contact, practice across matters instead of one narrow slice, a schedule that is predictable, a path that leads somewhere.
None of that offsets a figure a candidate cannot accept — but it is what your offer competes alongside, and it belongs in the posting rather than saved for the interview.
A signing or relocation bonus is one more lever; the mechanics are their own subject, and our guide to signing bonuses and relocation covers them.
Tactics that work for small firms
Run your own calendar, not the OCI one.
The same NALP data that shows the system's speed also shows its channel: 80% of 2L summer offers in the 2025 cycle came from employer-sponsored recruiting — direct applications — not from law-school events.
A small firm's version of that channel is relationships: the law schools in your city, moot court and journal contacts, a posting that goes up in the fall for next summer instead of the spring.
Our guides to recruiting from law schools and to running a summer associate program are the role-level playbooks.
Be the process NALP is asking for.
The Principles ask employers to set reasonable response deadlines, consider reasonable extension requests, avoid undue pressure on candidates, and make offers in writing with all terms clear.
In a recruiting environment where NALP itself has said some practices may put undue pressure on students, a small firm that publishes its own timing guidelines and lets a candidate think is simply running the process the Principles describe — and that is a position a firm of any size can hold.
Screen for the job in front of you.
The FTC and EEOC's joint guidance on background checks warns that criminal-record exclusions which significantly disadvantage a protected group and do not predict job performance can be unlawful disparate impact — a caution that speaks directly to blanket screens copied from another firm's application.
Tie every screen to the duties the role actually carries.
One scope note: state and city fair-chance laws were outside our research, so the patchwork they create is one to confirm with employment counsel rather than from this page.
The step-by-step rules live in our guide to background checks for law firms.
Then spend the effort where it compounds: a posting that states the work, the supervision and the pay honestly; channels picked deliberately — our guide to where to post jobs covers them; and the staff you already have, because every experienced paralegal you keep is one you do not have to recruit this year.
Our retention guides for associates and for legal staff cover the keeping side.
See what candidates see before you post: the attorney jobs and paralegal jobs boards are a fast read on what competing postings ask for and offer right now.
Employer information, not legal advice. This page cites published survey and projection data as of the dates named and describes agency guidance with the agency named — NALP for the recruiting data and Principles, the FTC and EEOC for background-check guidance, BLS for employment projections. Confirm your screening and hiring practices with employment counsel and, where professional-conduct rules are in play, your state bar's ethics counsel.
The small-firm hiring checklist
- Your posting states the work, the supervision, the schedule and the pay before the first candidate reads it.
- You have benchmarked pay against your own market, not against a scale published for firms of a different size.
- Your recruiting calendar starts earlier than the season you hired on last time — summer-associate recruiting closes early.
- Every screen in your process ties to a duty the role actually carries.
- Your offer deadlines are reasonable, extension requests get considered, and the offer is in writing with all terms clear.
- You have a retention answer for the experienced staff you already employ.
Questions employers ask
Is there really a lawyer shortage?
The national totals we cite do not show one: the ABA counted 1,374,720 lawyers in 2025, up 1.38% from the year before, and the BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook projects paralegal and legal assistant employment to show little or no change from 2025 to 2035.
What no series in our research measures is unfilled openings at small firms — the shortage small firms describe is about competition, timing and price for specific people, not a shrinking national headcount.
Treat any national shortage statistic without a named source skeptically; we could not verify one.
Do I have to match BigLaw pay to hire an associate?
Nothing requires it — the question is what your market pays for the work you are hiring for.
For orientation: NALP's 2025 Associate Salary Survey found a median first-year base of $200,000 as of January 1, 2025, and a reported June 2026 memo put the large-firm scale's first-year step at $235,000 effective July 1, 2026 — a figure our research could not verify.
Neither is a small-firm number.
Benchmark your own market before you write the offer, and compete on the terms of the work you can offer.
Does NALP require law firm offers to stay open for a set number of days?
No. NALP's Principles for a Fair and Ethical Recruitment Process are suggested best practices, not binding rules, and the current version leaves offer timing and how long an offer stays open to each employer — it asks employers to publish their own guidelines and to set reasonable response deadlines without a fixed day count.
If you have read that NALP mandates a specific hold period, that wording is not in the current Principles.
Can a small law firm still run background checks on candidates?
Yes.
The FTC and EEOC's joint guidance says it is generally not illegal to ask about an applicant's background or require a check, except for restrictions on certain medical and genetic information.
When the check comes from a consumer reporting company, the FCRA requires a stand-alone written notice — not a line inside the application — and the candidate's written permission.
The same guidance cautions that exclusions that significantly disadvantage a protected group without predicting job performance can be unlawful.
Confirm the steps with employment counsel.
More hiring resources
When you are ready to post the desk
Put the opening in front of associates and paralegals on a board built only for legal jobs.

